The Science Department, St Bernard’s Catholic High School
Coaching vs Mentoring in Schools: What Works Best for Pupils to Boost GCSE Grades?
Coaching vs Mentoring Pupils in Schools: The Great Experiment
Hypothesis: If students are coached will they make better progress than if they are mentored?
1). 20 students were identified by the Science department to move from E or D (2-3) grades in their June GCSE Exam to C (4-5) grades in their January re-sit
2). Students were divided into 2 groups: 11 were coached & 9 were mentored
3). Parents were invited to a meeting where the Head of Department explained the process
4). Science IEPs were given out for Students and Parents to sign
5). Each intervention student was allocated a coach
6). Weekly meetings of 20-40 minutes took place and students were able to request extra meetings if required.
Conclusion: Coaching pupils using the Coachinginschools Coaching System worked FAR more effectively (and it was far more manageable for staff) than mentoring pupils.
Congratulations to St Bernard’s Science Department for their remarkable success coaching pupils. Thank you for sharing your results and “Coaching vs Mentoring – Experiment” with us.
We’d also like to thank and give a special mention to Katie Galvaey who conducted this research task into Coaching vs Mentoring pupils as part of an M.A. in Education